The second one was auto-enhanced. It gives it a different look.
Friday, September 4, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I love to travel. I love animals. I love nature. And I love photography. I started taking up the hobby in 2006. I am only fifteen and I'm ready to make a career out of it. All of the pictures on my blog, are the real thing and belong to me. Some of them posted, I took when I was twelve, but most are more recent. There have been minor edits. I am thankful and blessed for all of the exciting opportunities I have already had. I have only just begun.
1 comments:
Isn't it amazing what technology does to the images we capture. Since the software reads "1" & "0" across everything it doesn't know a bird from a branch or the sky. But some programmer set a average/mean algorithm to balance color against contrast and voila... we get auto-enhance. In my opinion, they are both viable. What I mean to say is that they both can have a time and place to be the better image. In a photoframe I may prefer teh blue sky. But I also use many of my photos for band promotion and concert posters... I can see the whitened background working or me better. Always take a good look between auto function like auto-enhance, auto-color and auto-contrast. These three in particular can give you results you like or not like. Where one work for sky a different may work better for water, etc.
Post a Comment